Current:Home > MyA federal judge again declares that DACA is illegal. Issue likely to be decided by US Supreme Court -ProfitLogic
A federal judge again declares that DACA is illegal. Issue likely to be decided by US Supreme Court
View
Date:2025-04-12 11:24:23
HOUSTON (AP) — A federal judge on Wednesday declared illegal a revised version of a federal policy that prevents the deportation of hundreds of thousands of immigrants brought to the U.S. as children.
U.S. District Judge Andrew Hanen agreed with Texas and eight other states suing to stop the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA, program. The judge’s ruling was ultimately expected to be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, sending the program’s fate before the high court for a third time.
Hanen barred the government from approving any new applications, but left the program intact for existing recipients during the expected appeals process. Hanen said his order does not require the federal government to take any actions against DACA recipients.
The states have argued the Obama administration didn’t have the authority to first create the program in 2012 because it circumvented Congress.
In 2021, Hanen had declared the program illegal, ruling it had not been subject to public notice and comment periods required under the federal Administrative Procedures Act.
The Biden administration tried to satisfy Hanen’s concerns with a new version of DACA that took effect in October 2022 and was subject to public comments as part of a formal rule-making process.
But Hanen, who was appointed by then-President George W. Bush in 2002, ruled the updated version of DACA was still illegal. He had previously said DACA was unconstitutional and it would be up to Congress to enact legislation shielding people under the program, often known as “Dreamers.”
Hanen also had previously ruled the states had standing to file their lawsuit because they had been harmed by the program.
The states have claimed they incur hundreds of millions of dollars in health care, education and other costs when immigrants are allowed to remain in the country illegally. The states that sued are Texas, Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana, Nebraska, South Carolina, West Virginia, Kansas and Mississippi.
Those defending the program — the federal government, the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund and the state of New Jersey — had argued the states failed to present evidence that any of the costs they allege they have incurred have been tied to DACA recipients. They also argued Congress has given the Department of Homeland Security the legal authority to set immigration enforcement policies.
Despite previously declaring the DACA program illegal, Hanen had left the Obama-era program intact for those already benefiting from it. But he had ruled there could be no new applicants while appeals were pending.
There were 578,680 people enrolled in DACA at the end of March, according to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.
The program has faced a roller coaster of court challenges over the years.
In 2016, the Supreme Court deadlocked 4-4 over an expanded DACA and a version of the program for parents of DACA recipients. In 2020, the high court ruled 5-4 that the Trump administration improperly ended DACA, allowing it to stay in place.
In 2022, the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans upheld Hanen’s earlier ruling declaring DACA illegal, but sent the case back to him to review changes made to the program by the Biden administration.
President Joe Biden and advocacy groups have called on Congress to pass permanent protections for “ dreamers.” Congress has failed multiple times to pass proposals called the DREAM Act to protect DACA recipients.
veryGood! (19219)
Related
- Which apps offer encrypted messaging? How to switch and what to know after feds’ warning
- South Carolina to take a break from executions for the holidays
- Dramatic video shows Phoenix police rescue, pull man from car submerged in pool: Watch
- J.Crew Outlet Quietly Drops Their Black Friday Deals - Save Up to 70% off Everything, Styles Start at $12
- San Francisco names street for Associated Press photographer who captured the iconic Iwo Jima photo
- Florida State can't afford to fire Mike Norvell -- and can't afford to keep him
- USMNT Concacaf Nations League quarterfinal Leg 1 vs. Jamaica: Live stream and TV, rosters
- J.Crew Outlet Quietly Drops Their Black Friday Deals - Save Up to 70% off Everything, Styles Start at $12
- Skins Game to make return to Thanksgiving week with a modern look
- Vermont man is fit to stand trial over shooting of 3 Palestinian college students
Ranking
- See you latte: Starbucks plans to cut 30% of its menu
- Dick Van Dyke says he 'fortunately' won't be around for Trump's second presidency
- Cruel Intentions' Brooke Lena Johnson Teases the Biggest Differences Between the Show and the 1999 Film
- Wisconsin agency issues first round of permits for Enbridge Line 5 reroute around reservation
- See you latte: Starbucks plans to cut 30% of its menu
- Trading wands for whisks, new Harry Potter cooking show brings mess and magic
- Natural gas flares sparked 2 wildfires in North Dakota, state agency says
- High-scoring night in NBA: Giannis Antetokounmpo explodes for 59, Victor Wembanyama for 50
Recommendation
The Super Bowl could end in a 'three
Japan to resume V-22 flights after inquiry finds pilot error caused accident
Mechanic dies after being 'trapped' under Amazon delivery van at Florida-based center
Watch out, Temu: Amazon Haul, Amazon's new discount store, is coming for the holidays
Federal court filings allege official committed perjury in lawsuit tied to Louisiana grain terminal
Shaun White Reveals How He and Fiancée Nina Dobrev Overcome Struggles in Their Relationship
Will Aaron Rodgers retire? Jets QB tells reporters he plans to play in 2025
Bankruptcy judge questioned Shilo Sanders' no-show at previous trial